<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RSS vs Atom, you know, &#8220;for dummies&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2005/07/rss-vs-atom-you-know-for-dummies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2005/07/rss-vs-atom-you-know-for-dummies/</link>
	<description>A blog on entrepreneurship, user experience, and web innovation. Published by Fred Oliveira.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:19:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: About RSS (no not the Saffron Brigade) &#171; Harish Krishan B</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2005/07/rss-vs-atom-you-know-for-dummies/comment-page-1/#comment-42445</link>
		<dc:creator>About RSS (no not the Saffron Brigade) &#171; Harish Krishan B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/?p=79#comment-42445</guid>
		<description>[...] popular types of syndincation process, RSS &amp; Atom. A good comparison of the two can be found here. I am not going to elaborate on this as this syndication process is done by the Blog Service [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] popular types of syndincation process, RSS &amp; Atom. A good comparison of the two can be found here. I am not going to elaborate on this as this syndication process is done by the Blog Service [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RSS and Twitterfeed &#8212; a bit of a tutorial &#124; Art blog of April VanSickle</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2005/07/rss-vs-atom-you-know-for-dummies/comment-page-1/#comment-42015</link>
		<dc:creator>RSS and Twitterfeed &#8212; a bit of a tutorial &#124; Art blog of April VanSickle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 17:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/?p=79#comment-42015</guid>
		<description>[...] http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2005/07/rss-vs-atom-you-know-for-dummies/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2005/07/rss-vs-atom-you-know-for-dummies/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2005/07/rss-vs-atom-you-know-for-dummies/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Web 2.0 This Week (July 17 - 23)</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2005/07/rss-vs-atom-you-know-for-dummies/comment-page-1/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Web 2.0 This Week (July 17 - 23)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2005 04:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/?p=79#comment-192</guid>
		<description>[...] 9. RSS v. Atom for Dummies [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 9. RSS v. Atom for Dummies [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2005/07/rss-vs-atom-you-know-for-dummies/comment-page-1/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 07:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/?p=79#comment-184</guid>
		<description>Fred, Great essay. I am going to link to this in our next weekly wrapup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fred, Great essay. I am going to link to this in our next weekly wrapup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fred</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2005/07/rss-vs-atom-you-know-for-dummies/comment-page-1/#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 04:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/?p=79#comment-183</guid>
		<description>Thats true, Scott. Which may be seen as a bad decision by Dave Winer and the rest of the RSS group, in my own humble opinion. Particularly now that RSS is taking off in the business world (heck, we&#039;re seeing venture capital funds off 100m just for RSS ventures), a name change will confuse both users and investors with no clear technological background.

Still, your point is very valid, I&#039;ll update the story to reflect that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats true, Scott. Which may be seen as a bad decision by Dave Winer and the rest of the RSS group, in my own humble opinion. Particularly now that RSS is taking off in the business world (heck, we&#8217;re seeing venture capital funds off 100m just for RSS ventures), a name change will confuse both users and investors with no clear technological background.</p>
<p>Still, your point is very valid, I&#8217;ll update the story to reflect that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sco</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2005/07/rss-vs-atom-you-know-for-dummies/comment-page-1/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>sco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 03:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/?p=79#comment-182</guid>
		<description>&quot;other (improved) versions of RSS are bound to emerge in due time&quot;

Actually, according to the RSS 2 spec (http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss#roadmap), it&#039;s not intended that any significant changes/improvements occur under the RSS 2 name, but rather under new names. Atom can fairly be considered just that -- a continuation of RSS&#039;s work, done under a new name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;other (improved) versions of RSS are bound to emerge in due time&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually, according to the RSS 2 spec (<a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss#roadmap" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss#roadmap</a>), it&#8217;s not intended that any significant changes/improvements occur under the RSS 2 name, but rather under new names. Atom can fairly be considered just that &#8212; a continuation of RSS&#8217;s work, done under a new name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

