<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Technorati controlling the blogosphere?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2005/07/technorati-and-the-blogosphere/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2005/07/technorati-and-the-blogosphere/</link>
	<description>A blog on entrepreneurship, user experience, and web innovation. Published by Fred Oliveira.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:19:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Web 2.0 This Week (July 10 - 16)</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2005/07/technorati-and-the-blogosphere/comment-page-1/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Web 2.0 This Week (July 10 - 16)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2005 10:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/?p=72#comment-175</guid>
		<description>[...] More Points of View: Dave Sifry, Syntagma, Frank Gruber, BusinessWeek, Blog Herald, ChrisWere.com, WeBreakStuff, Jeremy Wright, Jeremy Wright #2, Newest Industry, Hans on Experience, Scoble, David Berlind  2. RSS v. Atom - Tim Bray posts a comparative chart [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More Points of View: Dave Sifry, Syntagma, Frank Gruber, BusinessWeek, Blog Herald, ChrisWere.com, WeBreakStuff, Jeremy Wright, Jeremy Wright #2, Newest Industry, Hans on Experience, Scoble, David Berlind  2. RSS v. Atom &#8211; Tim Bray posts a comparative chart [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory Hoyl Jr.</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2005/07/technorati-and-the-blogosphere/comment-page-1/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory Hoyl Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2005 15:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/?p=72#comment-167</guid>
		<description>I have been testing/building applications that act somewhat like what they have over at http://www.blogpulse.com/, using Technorati&#039;s APIs. From a marketing POV, the news that Technorati is thinking about offering services to better &quot;measure&quot; brands in the blogosphere sounds great... but I can understand why this may seem scary to some bloggers.

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been testing/building applications that act somewhat like what they have over at <a href="http://www.blogpulse.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.blogpulse.com/</a>, using Technorati&#8217;s APIs. From a marketing POV, the news that Technorati is thinking about offering services to better &#8220;measure&#8221; brands in the blogosphere sounds great&#8230; but I can understand why this may seem scary to some bloggers.</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fred</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2005/07/technorati-and-the-blogosphere/comment-page-1/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2005 21:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/?p=72#comment-166</guid>
		<description>Even though I get your point, I&#039;m still wondering how most bloggers would see the idea of profit being made out of their own opinions. 

Your comment makes me want to point out something else. Even being what you could call &quot;public&quot;, not all information on the web is meant for consumption on a statistic base. I for one share my content over a CC licensing scheme which allows for derivative works (which collected statistics could tangentially be considered), but not everybody is happy about being another number being sold to create new products.

Remember I&#039;m an apologist of free culture, free knowledge, free information and the remixing world. But not everybody is. Those are the people who&#039;s opinions I wonder about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though I get your point, I&#8217;m still wondering how most bloggers would see the idea of profit being made out of their own opinions. </p>
<p>Your comment makes me want to point out something else. Even being what you could call &#8220;public&#8221;, not all information on the web is meant for consumption on a statistic base. I for one share my content over a CC licensing scheme which allows for derivative works (which collected statistics could tangentially be considered), but not everybody is happy about being another number being sold to create new products.</p>
<p>Remember I&#8217;m an apologist of free culture, free knowledge, free information and the remixing world. But not everybody is. Those are the people who&#8217;s opinions I wonder about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Peters</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2005/07/technorati-and-the-blogosphere/comment-page-1/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2005 21:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/?p=72#comment-165</guid>
		<description>The Internet is entirely public, so why should anyone be surprised that someone would scheme up such an idea?  I think a blogger needs to consider such risks (amongst many others when considering potential audiences of his or her information) when parading their thoughts and ideas out in public.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Internet is entirely public, so why should anyone be surprised that someone would scheme up such an idea?  I think a blogger needs to consider such risks (amongst many others when considering potential audiences of his or her information) when parading their thoughts and ideas out in public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

