<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Redesigning TechCrunch &#8211; a weblog case study</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2005/08/redesigning-techcrunch-a-weblog-case-study/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2005/08/redesigning-techcrunch-a-weblog-case-study/</link>
	<description>A blog on entrepreneurship, user experience, and web innovation. Published by Fred Oliveira.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:19:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: WeBreakStuff &#187; Now that it&#8217;s gone: On designing Techcrunch</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2005/08/redesigning-techcrunch-a-weblog-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-1797</link>
		<dc:creator>WeBreakStuff &#187; Now that it&#8217;s gone: On designing Techcrunch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 15:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/?p=86#comment-1797</guid>
		<description>[...] Techcrunch&#8217;s previous design, which I&#8217;ve done around June 2005, resisted for almost a year and accompanied the blog in it&#8217;s tremendous growth to the 53.000 daily readers mark. Despite all its flaws (because there were a few, particularly to my eyes), it was recognized by the industry as a clear exercise on what &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; blog design was about. It&#8217;s not up to me to agree or disagree with that statement because I&#8217;d probably be biased, but this post clears up on what the line of thought was, on designing the previous Techcrunch (now only seen on the screenshot). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Techcrunch&#8217;s previous design, which I&#8217;ve done around June 2005, resisted for almost a year and accompanied the blog in it&#8217;s tremendous growth to the 53.000 daily readers mark. Despite all its flaws (because there were a few, particularly to my eyes), it was recognized by the industry as a clear exercise on what &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; blog design was about. It&#8217;s not up to me to agree or disagree with that statement because I&#8217;d probably be biased, but this post clears up on what the line of thought was, on designing the previous Techcrunch (now only seen on the screenshot). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weblogs Work &#187; Adventures in Great Blog Design</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2005/08/redesigning-techcrunch-a-weblog-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>Weblogs Work &#187; Adventures in Great Blog Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2005 11:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/?p=86#comment-229</guid>
		<description>[...] WeBreakStuff has a nice backgrounder on their work redesigning the TechCrunch site.&#160; It looks supersweet, but even better are the things they kept in mind throughout the redesign: 1) Rule number 1: KISS. You know, the good old &#8220;keep it simple, stupid&#8221;. Aim for looks, yes, but only if information is first on your priority list. Stop giving me the &#8220;if it looks good, it has to be good&#8221; thing, because it&#8217;s not always the case. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] WeBreakStuff has a nice backgrounder on their work redesigning the TechCrunch site.&nbsp; It looks supersweet, but even better are the things they kept in mind throughout the redesign: 1) Rule number 1: KISS. You know, the good old &ldquo;keep it simple, stupid&rdquo;. Aim for looks, yes, but only if information is first on your priority list. Stop giving me the &ldquo;if it looks good, it has to be good&rdquo; thing, because it&rsquo;s not always the case. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2005/08/redesigning-techcrunch-a-weblog-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2005 04:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/?p=86#comment-214</guid>
		<description>Very impressive. TechCrunch is now on my top five must check every 5 mins loop. I&#039;m chruning through the archives now!!!! Great job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very impressive. TechCrunch is now on my top five must check every 5 mins loop. I&#8217;m chruning through the archives now!!!! Great job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fred</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2005/08/redesigning-techcrunch-a-weblog-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2005 10:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/?p=86#comment-209</guid>
		<description>Vucabel: That&#039;s very true. Something I&#039;ll be doing, though, is launching the new webreakstuff design that will take care of all of these outstanding issues with the current website. Hopefully you&#039;ll see things by then.

There&#039;s also a lot of work that I&#039;m not able to put out there because of being under NDAs (mostly intranet work) which is unfortunate. But I will definitely have more information up. Keep an eye out.

And thanks a lot for your wonderful comments. I love constructive feedback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vucabel: That&#8217;s very true. Something I&#8217;ll be doing, though, is launching the new webreakstuff design that will take care of all of these outstanding issues with the current website. Hopefully you&#8217;ll see things by then.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s also a lot of work that I&#8217;m not able to put out there because of being under NDAs (mostly intranet work) which is unfortunate. But I will definitely have more information up. Keep an eye out.</p>
<p>And thanks a lot for your wonderful comments. I love constructive feedback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vucabei</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2005/08/redesigning-techcrunch-a-weblog-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>vucabei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2005 09:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/?p=86#comment-208</guid>
		<description>Looks fantastic! (as does all of your work that I&#039;ve seen)  One thing that drives me nuts about your weblog and theirs are the tiny screenshot pictures in the posts.  Every time I see one I want to click it to load the pic full screen.  

Luckily, the techcrunch site with the new design is live, so I just went to it and got to see it.

Your portfolio page on this site is notorious for this.  You have tiny screenshots of your work that don&#039;t do anything when clicked, and worse yet, you don&#039;t have links to most of the sites, yet the tiny pictures look so beautiful and interesting.  Such a tease!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks fantastic! (as does all of your work that I&#8217;ve seen)  One thing that drives me nuts about your weblog and theirs are the tiny screenshot pictures in the posts.  Every time I see one I want to click it to load the pic full screen.  </p>
<p>Luckily, the techcrunch site with the new design is live, so I just went to it and got to see it.</p>
<p>Your portfolio page on this site is notorious for this.  You have tiny screenshots of your work that don&#8217;t do anything when clicked, and worse yet, you don&#8217;t have links to most of the sites, yet the tiny pictures look so beautiful and interesting.  Such a tease!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

