A company I wouldn’t work for
I’ve always said it. I would never work for a company that doesn’t innovate. Which is exactly why I’d never work with Microsoft - even though as I grew up I dreamt about it. But before I get crucified by Scoble and a horde of Microsoft aficionados though, I’ll clarify:
We see no innovation at all coming from Microsoft. Even all the hype surrounding the PDC, Windows Vista, the new WinFX platform strikes me as nothing but marketing or word of mouth from people who just don’t know any better. When was the last time you actually saw Microsoft do something new that would radically change your life? I haven’t in a long (perhaps too long) time.
Windows Vista is clearly needing $100M investments to look (and I do mean just look) decent - it doesn’t pack any of the features I was waiting for (WinFS, Monad, etc), and instead it packs a whole bunch of limitations imposed by the need for DRM monitors, 2 gigs of RAM and 256mb graphics cards. Office 12 has no real features I need, and the new toolbars look like a perpetuous excuse to scream “Where are my functions?”. So why should 2006 be the year of Microsoft? You have to be kidding me.
Still, despite all the people who are waking up to the disappointing reality that Microsoft is stale (and has been for years now), there’s still guys who blindly believe Microsoft is doing new stuff when it’s clearly not. Ideas inspired by Cupertino, extremely late adoption of RSS, trying to frame Apple by patenting the iPod, not embracing standards, being flaky about features for Vista - these are all tips to the great conclusion that Microsoft is late in the game and they want a piece of a cake that’s just not theirs anymore.
2006, year of Microsoft? No, not really. As Douglas Adams would say, “So long, and thanks for all the fish”. There are new players in the field.
