Webreakstuff blog

Archive
December, 2005 Monthly archive

Let creatives be creative

Creativity In the always amazing Creating Passionate Users, there’s a new post about micromanagement, and its effects on employee productivity. They start the post out with one of the most interesting (and true) remarks I’ve seen lately: The most important function for a manager is X = -Y, where X is employee brain use and Y is degree of management. To use the horse whisperer’s advice, “The more you use your reins, the less they’ll use their brains.”

If you recognize value, trust.

Working with the right people (remember I’ve written about hiring the right people a couple of days ago) means trust, and trust is a complicated thing to go around and give everyone. However, bare with me, we’re talking about the right people – the genius (or geniuses) you just added to your team to bring your project to a whole new level. Those guys, you should trust.

If you expect someone to give their best, you need to let them get to their best on their own, or their vision will never be as clear as you want it to be. Remember that even though sometimes it goes against the laws of management, some people work better on the worst of schedules, with the worst types of communication, and with the worst kind of conditions. But a genius is a genius, he’ll get the job done.

If they know their business, trust their judgement

Again from Creating Passionate Users: “Micromanagers often believe that they know more, and more importantly — care more. Often they’re right. But it’s a downward spiral“. This is one unfortunate truth. If managers knew about all crafts perfectly and could execute them perfectly, we wouldn’t need creatives – in fact, we would all be training to be a manager. One of the most dificult decisions a manager can do is to get out of the way of creation, because it usually means letting the grip go for a while. It will be worth it.

Realizing your limitations is usually the first step to hiring the right talent, so keep that in mind when controlling the output of any creative.

The right idea, the right person

Give the right person the right idea and let them run with it. The right person will surprise you. You just need to apply the best characteristic in any project manager – trust. Now, if you haven’t clicked through to the great post on micromanagement over at Creating Passionate Users, do so now, and stop creating zombie workers.

Art of Project Management If you’re looking for solid reading about project management, Scott Berkun’s book “The Art of Project Management” is probably the best book I’ve read recently on the subject. One of the sections on the book is entirely dedicated to the subject of how management is tightly connected to trusting people and their roles. A great read.

A great review of the book is available on the also amazing Boxes and Arrows – read the review notes if you are wondering whether the book is a good investment for your shelves.

Click here to read the full post!

Post full feeds. Please.

Syndicated contentFace it, if you care about the feeds you publish, you know you’re doing it for the power-users. And if you’re doing it for the power-users, you understand their lack of time – even though they love your content (because they subscribe!) – for visiting your website everytime you post a new item.

Full RSS feeds are, right after quality content, what keeps me subscribed to a given blog. This isn’t because I don’t respect the author, or care less about what he has to say. But the limited time I have to read feeds usually means I only jump to the website whenever I have something compelling to say (I still believe we need a way to comment and follow-up on stories independently of the original website – here’s a research idea for anyone who wants to think about it), or when I’m really curious about what other people are saying.

Full feeds are not attracting plagiarism to your blog, or allowing people to steal your content (like some people are saying). They’re empowering your readers to take your content anywhere and everywhere. Because above everything else, they love what you write. So, care about your users. Post full feeds. Please.

Link to plagiarism story via this post on Om Malik’s Gigaom.

Click here to read the full post!

Fewer templates, more user experience

Usability One of the things that needs to change in 2006 (which will undoubtedly be the year of the web-application) is the care for user experience and usability. Many managers and business-people need to change their perspective and hire the right people to take their web-businesses to a new level. We are no longer in 1999, age of Photoshop-designed templates and lens flare effects on homepages, cut into place in Dreamweaver MX.

We’ve been getting quite a few work proposals in the last few weeks – which you’d say is by any standards, a good thing. But the percentage of people (even on very high places) who have no clear notion of how user-centered design and information architecture should work for their company and websites is astonishing.

It’s almost 2006, let’s talk 2006

I’ve said this before, but I’ll repeat: “The key to successful web applications is how much it puts the user in the center of the process”. What this means is that any design, for any webpage or web-application needs to take into consideration the user, not the looks.

The notion that a page needs to be pixel perfect before usability snaps into the process is wrong. Usability, user experience and information architecture need to be present from the start of development and design. This means that if you’re looking for people to send you “3 photoshop templates” of pages, you’re driving steady against the wall of “bad investment”.

Remember the rule: “The key to successful web applications is how much it puts the user in the center of the process”.

If you really want a web-based business,

If you really want a web-based business, your request shouldn’t be for “templates” or “layouts”. Your question should be “how can I make my users/readers come back for more of what I’m offering?”. That’s the question we like to answer. The reason why is simple – there’s basically two schools of web-designers and developers:

  • Those that do webpages by thinking about color schemes, pixel-perfect placement of headers, titles and images. They get your job done if your page is a visit-once endeavour (in which case, you don’t really have a web business). They do not get the job done if you need to make sense to your users and readers. A web-application (or a blog) is not a concert-night poster.
  • Those that want to know your business and your users first, consider all the aspects, and then implement them (even with all the bells and whistles the first kind of designer would get you). This is the right kind of people you want if you are building something for everyone. Someone (or a team) or knows engineering and breathes it into the design. People with people skills and talent.

So is there a ROI in user experience?

Short answer is a resounding “yes”. You can see clearly that the web-applications that succeed are the ones that had a budget for user experience and information architecture. Does it cost them? Usually, yes – sometimes even more than the development itself. But the difference between an application that people use from one that people don’t bother with, relies in 99% of the cases on how well information is structured and how intuitive it is – not how the code works.

Conclusion

If you manage a web-application or a web-based business and are thinking about a new look, don’t think color schemes – or hire people that think about color schemes and layouts. Think about the best ways to make what you do clear to your visitors – and hire people accordingly. It might become one of your best decisions.

Click here to read the full post!

Why Web 2.0 makes sense

Lately there’s been some discussion about whether or not to use the term “Web 2.0″ in the future. Was it all just a fad? Are we cheating people and marketing fake concepts? Russel Shaw over at ZDNet boldly says it doesn’t exist. Richard McManus says it’s the nail in the coffin and calls quits on using the term. Winer says “Busted!“. Mike keeps the Web 2.0 flag way up and in a friendly move calls everybody a bastard in his SouthPark impression.

But enough of others, here’s what Web 2.0 means to me. Web 2.0 encompasses many of the technological changes we’re seeing happen. It means a new way to look at web applications, services and (more importantly in my case), user experience. Web 2.0 puts the user in the center of the action and activity.

So why Web 2.0? Is this a new version of anything? Well no, but if you called it “new web” people wouldn’t care. If it hadn’t become a movement, many of the services emerging now would have never existed. If it didn’t have support from the right people, it wouldn’t be, effectively, changing the face of the web.

Does it make sense to keep the term going? As long as we’re still working towards a user-centered web, better uses for data, more service integration and more simplicity, yes. And I’ll keep using it. I know many others will too.

Click here to read the full post!