<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web applications: APIs, use but be ready</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2006/01/web-applications-apis-use-but-be-ready/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2006/01/web-applications-apis-use-but-be-ready/</link>
	<description>A blog on entrepreneurship, user experience, and web innovation. Published by Fred Oliveira.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:19:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2006/01/web-applications-apis-use-but-be-ready/comment-page-1/#comment-1243</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 02:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2006/01/web-applications-apis-use-but-be-ready/#comment-1243</guid>
		<description>Lol, we don&#039;t actually run the server now, do we?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol, we don&#8217;t actually run the server now, do we?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khang</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2006/01/web-applications-apis-use-but-be-ready/comment-page-1/#comment-1242</link>
		<dc:creator>Khang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 02:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2006/01/web-applications-apis-use-but-be-ready/#comment-1242</guid>
		<description>I guess what u are saying is very true. And I guess you guys DO break stuff. You&#039;ve broke techcrunch.com. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess what u are saying is very true. And I guess you guys DO break stuff. You&#8217;ve broke techcrunch.com. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pedro mg</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2006/01/web-applications-apis-use-but-be-ready/comment-page-1/#comment-1233</link>
		<dc:creator>pedro mg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2006 06:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2006/01/web-applications-apis-use-but-be-ready/#comment-1233</guid>
		<description>well,there are major players signig contracts with API using developpers. A risc ? Sure, but the benefits are huge. I am testing successfully an API for some weeks and it is really great to access those loads of data... As for p.ex. delicious and other temporary down_state for servers, it&#039;s not so much API faillure but platform temporary faillure. To the user, the thing is down, but not for serious reasons. As for &quot;public API&quot;... well, not so public. Here is a case where some standardization would be great, using Larry Page@CES speech. Web2.0 is flying to fast for standardization to follow &quot;her&quot;, don&#039;t you think ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well,there are major players signig contracts with API using developpers. A risc ? Sure, but the benefits are huge. I am testing successfully an API for some weeks and it is really great to access those loads of data&#8230; As for p.ex. delicious and other temporary down_state for servers, it&#8217;s not so much API faillure but platform temporary faillure. To the user, the thing is down, but not for serious reasons. As for &#8220;public API&#8221;&#8230; well, not so public. Here is a case where some standardization would be great, using Larry Page@CES speech. Web2.0 is flying to fast for standardization to follow &#8220;her&#8221;, don&#8217;t you think ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

