DEMO and paying to show
Peter Van Dijck nails it in 2 sentences:
At DEMO, they’re charging US$ 15,000 to do a demo (…). In other words, DEMO is only for VC companies, not web 2.0 companies (who are supposed to do without VC cash, right?).
DEMO’s not the only case of conferences where you need to pay to play, but if the whole thing is about the companies and products, shouldn’t money flow the other way around - or just not between conference and speakers?
Without companies, there would be no conference. Maybe I’m seeing things from the wrong perspective here, but I’d much rather go to an event where companies were invited for their merits instead of the money they can cash out in order to tell me how great they are.

I agree, the biggest problem I have with DEMO is that I live in Phoenix and did not hear about it until 2 days after it was over. Strange I thought, until I saw that it cost $2500 to get into the expo and walk around.
When and Where did DEMO get started, I have never even heard of it until this year. Based on what I am seeing, the VC’s can keep the show to themselves, there are far more inovative ideas on Emily Chang’s eHub.
Comment by Aaron Post — February 14, 2006 @ 2:34 pm