<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If blogging is a conversation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2006/08/blogging-conversation-usability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2006/08/blogging-conversation-usability/</link>
	<description>A blog on entrepreneurship, user experience, and web innovation. Published by Fred Oliveira.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:19:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugo</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2006/08/blogging-conversation-usability/comment-page-1/#comment-4023</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 08:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2006/08/blogging-conversation-usability/#comment-4023</guid>
		<description>But thatÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s not the only problem, if blogging is a conversation, and bloggers have their email or other email for contact on their blogs, they must answer to every email they get, even with a simple answer, like a Ã¢â‚¬Å“thank you for your emailÃ¢â‚¬Â. I think that the bloggers must pay attention to this kind of relation with their readers, otherwise they could lost them, and who knows get bad promotion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But thatÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s not the only problem, if blogging is a conversation, and bloggers have their email or other email for contact on their blogs, they must answer to every email they get, even with a simple answer, like a Ã¢â‚¬Å“thank you for your emailÃ¢â‚¬Â. I think that the bloggers must pay attention to this kind of relation with their readers, otherwise they could lost them, and who knows get bad promotion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Javier</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2006/08/blogging-conversation-usability/comment-page-1/#comment-3833</link>
		<dc:creator>Javier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2006/08/blogging-conversation-usability/#comment-3833</guid>
		<description>And nevermind the blogs where a perfect valid and respectful comment gets censored out :( happened to me recently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And nevermind the blogs where a perfect valid and respectful comment gets censored out :( happened to me recently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Manheim</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2006/08/blogging-conversation-usability/comment-page-1/#comment-3823</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Manheim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 03:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2006/08/blogging-conversation-usability/#comment-3823</guid>
		<description>I think the majority of people automatically go into frankenstien mode... &quot;must have people,&quot; when they design the blog layout. It&#039;s easy to get carried away with &lt;em&gt;cool&lt;/em&gt; functionality and forget to ask &quot;what would I want, what do I need, what can I do without?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the majority of people automatically go into frankenstien mode&#8230; &#8220;must have people,&#8221; when they design the blog layout. It&#8217;s easy to get carried away with <em>cool</em> functionality and forget to ask &#8220;what would I want, what do I need, what can I do without?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

