<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on the iPhone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/01/apple-iphone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/01/apple-iphone/</link>
	<description>A blog on entrepreneurship, user experience, and web innovation. Published by Fred Oliveira.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:19:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mario</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/01/apple-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-22831</link>
		<dc:creator>Mario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 02:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/01/apple-iphone/#comment-22831</guid>
		<description>By the time this thing is launched in Asia  it will be an outdated  machine. The other players on the market just waited for the first one to launch a touch screen only based machine, slik look and some good marketing potential and so to open their way to launch their own machines. Let do the other the trick and walk away with it. I&#039;ve seen already some sleek looking machines out there on the net and it would surprise me to see Iphone look alikes in a very short time (Bang &amp; Olufsen maybe?) but with much better specs as the Iphone. You must have a loose wire in your mind to spend so much money on the IPhone with such a limited range of facilities. An eye candy it is however.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the time this thing is launched in Asia  it will be an outdated  machine. The other players on the market just waited for the first one to launch a touch screen only based machine, slik look and some good marketing potential and so to open their way to launch their own machines. Let do the other the trick and walk away with it. I&#8217;ve seen already some sleek looking machines out there on the net and it would surprise me to see Iphone look alikes in a very short time (Bang &amp; Olufsen maybe?) but with much better specs as the Iphone. You must have a loose wire in your mind to spend so much money on the IPhone with such a limited range of facilities. An eye candy it is however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webreakstuff &#187; iPhone, on the thin line between love and hate</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/01/apple-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-21262</link>
		<dc:creator>Webreakstuff &#187; iPhone, on the thin line between love and hate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 12:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/01/apple-iphone/#comment-21262</guid>
		<description>[...] Like many others, I did a post about the iPhone after the Macworld Keynote. Why? Because I was excited about the possibilities a device like the iPhone could bring, particularly when coming from a company I share so many values with, Apple. After reading through everything that&#8217;s been said and written, however, I&#8217;m not as excited as I was, the reasons being outlined below. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Like many others, I did a post about the iPhone after the Macworld Keynote. Why? Because I was excited about the possibilities a device like the iPhone could bring, particularly when coming from a company I share so many values with, Apple. After reading through everything that&#8217;s been said and written, however, I&#8217;m not as excited as I was, the reasons being outlined below. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Browne - Technology in Plain English</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/01/apple-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-20975</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Browne - Technology in Plain English</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/01/apple-iphone/#comment-20975</guid>
		<description>Not so much excited about the iPhone , as to the reaction of the other handset manufacturers - the phone market is going to be a different place in 9 months time when this reaches us (in Ireland). 

I wonder what Nokia is going to come up with in response ...


&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.firstpartners.net/blog&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Paul&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not so much excited about the iPhone , as to the reaction of the other handset manufacturers &#8211; the phone market is going to be a different place in 9 months time when this reaches us (in Ireland). </p>
<p>I wonder what Nokia is going to come up with in response &#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.firstpartners.net/blog" rel="nofollow">Paul</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PELF</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/01/apple-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-20474</link>
		<dc:creator>PELF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/01/apple-iphone/#comment-20474</guid>
		<description>Ok, the phone is really quite impressive as far as the interface is concerned, but personally i think they aimed the wrong way. They sould be targeting the critical mass of mobile users, and they&#039;d do exactly that with a small (think nano small) light, usable and cheap mobile phone. 

Picture your ipod nano with a keypad, gsm and sms capabilities, for something like 300$. I would buy it sooo much! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, the phone is really quite impressive as far as the interface is concerned, but personally i think they aimed the wrong way. They sould be targeting the critical mass of mobile users, and they&#8217;d do exactly that with a small (think nano small) light, usable and cheap mobile phone. </p>
<p>Picture your ipod nano with a keypad, gsm and sms capabilities, for something like 300$. I would buy it sooo much! ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/01/apple-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-20461</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/01/apple-iphone/#comment-20461</guid>
		<description>Ah, just saw the article where it says no 3rd party apps.  That *is* silly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, just saw the article where it says no 3rd party apps.  That *is* silly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/01/apple-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-20460</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/01/apple-iphone/#comment-20460</guid>
		<description>We&#039;re still in the &quot;information gathering&quot; phase for this device and it&#039;s prototypes, but I thought I heard that the thing ran OS X?!

If that&#039;s so, isn&#039;t Apple giving us a mobile platform with BSD, Cocoa, Obj C, etc...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re still in the &#8220;information gathering&#8221; phase for this device and it&#8217;s prototypes, but I thought I heard that the thing ran OS X?!</p>
<p>If that&#8217;s so, isn&#8217;t Apple giving us a mobile platform with BSD, Cocoa, Obj C, etc&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dandan</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/01/apple-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-20459</link>
		<dc:creator>dandan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/01/apple-iphone/#comment-20459</guid>
		<description>I agree - the battery life is way too short.

I don&#039;t think it&#039;s 3g either?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree &#8211; the battery life is way too short.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s 3g either?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Robin</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/01/apple-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-20458</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/01/apple-iphone/#comment-20458</guid>
		<description>My current phone, the very reasonable Sony Ericsson K750i is close to the end of it&#039;s life and I&#039;m about to replace it...I was considering the Sony Ericsson P990i...but then this news has sort of changed things a bit.
I want one..right now, OH YES, but the trouble is that it probably won&#039;t be launched here in the UK until the 3rd Quarter 2007...(which seems like AAAAaaaagggGGGGesss away). I might just groan like an oversized child until I get my hands on one then! Also - no news yet which companies will supply the iPhone in the UK...and that&#039;s going to be a factor too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My current phone, the very reasonable Sony Ericsson K750i is close to the end of it&#8217;s life and I&#8217;m about to replace it&#8230;I was considering the Sony Ericsson P990i&#8230;but then this news has sort of changed things a bit.<br />
I want one..right now, OH YES, but the trouble is that it probably won&#8217;t be launched here in the UK until the 3rd Quarter 2007&#8230;(which seems like AAAAaaaagggGGGGesss away). I might just groan like an oversized child until I get my hands on one then! Also &#8211; no news yet which companies will supply the iPhone in the UK&#8230;and that&#8217;s going to be a factor too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TIago Macedo</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/01/apple-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-20450</link>
		<dc:creator>TIago Macedo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/01/apple-iphone/#comment-20450</guid>
		<description>Without the ability to run user-developed applications, Apple seems to have missed a bit. This way it&#039;s only targeting corporate users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without the ability to run user-developed applications, Apple seems to have missed a bit. This way it&#8217;s only targeting corporate users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

