<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple(s), not oranges</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/06/apples-oranges/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/06/apples-oranges/</link>
	<description>A blog on entrepreneurship, user experience, and web innovation. Published by Fred Oliveira.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:56:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alberto</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/06/apples-oranges/comment-page-1/#comment-41218</link>
		<dc:creator>Alberto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 20:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/06/apples-oranges/#comment-41218</guid>
		<description>I could use the nwe menu bar of head in apple in my personal website?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could use the nwe menu bar of head in apple in my personal website?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antonie Potgieter</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/06/apples-oranges/comment-page-1/#comment-41177</link>
		<dc:creator>Antonie Potgieter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 00:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/06/apples-oranges/#comment-41177</guid>
		<description>I think Apple did a great job with their new site</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Apple did a great job with their new site</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mgist</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/06/apples-oranges/comment-page-1/#comment-41082</link>
		<dc:creator>mgist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 01:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/06/apples-oranges/#comment-41082</guid>
		<description>that&#039;s a funny spam blocker you&#039;ve got there.

so i have the answer to this overuse of this &quot;coverflow&quot; navigation business. i was driving one day and it just came to me.

the iphone... and leopard... coverflow... and the future of apple.

apple is instilling a sense of physical navigation, much like reading a book or magazine. the iphone is to get people excited about using their fingers and hands, the website is to train people to get used to the horizontal exploration... and i think that in the next year, maybe two.. we can expect a newton like tablet or a macbook tablet... with dual touch. microsoft surface jumped the gun to cheesy hand and screen interaction, hp has that awesome touchscreen desktop - Apple, of course, will top it all... and it&#039;s going to be some funky touchy side-scrolly thing...

i&#039;m calling it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s a funny spam blocker you&#8217;ve got there.</p>
<p>so i have the answer to this overuse of this &#8220;coverflow&#8221; navigation business. i was driving one day and it just came to me.</p>
<p>the iphone&#8230; and leopard&#8230; coverflow&#8230; and the future of apple.</p>
<p>apple is instilling a sense of physical navigation, much like reading a book or magazine. the iphone is to get people excited about using their fingers and hands, the website is to train people to get used to the horizontal exploration&#8230; and i think that in the next year, maybe two.. we can expect a newton like tablet or a macbook tablet&#8230; with dual touch. microsoft surface jumped the gun to cheesy hand and screen interaction, hp has that awesome touchscreen desktop &#8211; Apple, of course, will top it all&#8230; and it&#8217;s going to be some funky touchy side-scrolly thing&#8230;</p>
<p>i&#8217;m calling it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xavi</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/06/apples-oranges/comment-page-1/#comment-41072</link>
		<dc:creator>xavi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 09:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/06/apples-oranges/#comment-41072</guid>
		<description>mmmm if i click in a section called &quot;ipod + itunes&quot; i&#039;ll expect find ipod and itunes. i don&#039;t see any problem.

i&#039;ve shirts and trousers in my closet and i still can find my clothes =P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mmmm if i click in a section called &#8220;ipod + itunes&#8221; i&#8217;ll expect find ipod and itunes. i don&#8217;t see any problem.</p>
<p>i&#8217;ve shirts and trousers in my closet and i still can find my clothes =P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Gretar</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/06/apples-oranges/comment-page-1/#comment-41067</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Gretar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/06/apples-oranges/#comment-41067</guid>
		<description>I like the new page. I find it sleek and amazingly easy to find what you need. I also like that they put the breadcrumbs and a quick sitetree at the button. That means that it&#039;s right in front of you when you have finished reading the page. No need to scroll back up.

They seem though to have forgotten that they make a lot of software too since there is no obvious way to go there on the front page. Not everyone will figure out that the search field is not a search field at all but a Spotlight like product finder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the new page. I find it sleek and amazingly easy to find what you need. I also like that they put the breadcrumbs and a quick sitetree at the button. That means that it&#8217;s right in front of you when you have finished reading the page. No need to scroll back up.</p>
<p>They seem though to have forgotten that they make a lot of software too since there is no obvious way to go there on the front page. Not everyone will figure out that the search field is not a search field at all but a Spotlight like product finder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Oliveira</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/06/apples-oranges/comment-page-1/#comment-41066</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Oliveira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/06/apples-oranges/#comment-41066</guid>
		<description>Thomas: I understand where you&#039;re coming from, but I still have to disagree - mixing products and actions is an odd choice. More to the point is all the scrolling you have to do if you want, say, information about the new Safari beta and have no real pointers on where to look. Or looking for iLife, which is under the &quot;Mac&quot; tab now, next to the iMac (what?!). It goes on and on.

Keep in mind that although they do have lots of data about usage patterns, they pretty much changed all the site, so that data is very much bogus right now. It&#039;s still Apple, I love the design itself, but the navigation itself (the path to what you&#039;re looking for) feels weird.

Nate: I&#039;m not sure I understand what you mean. Care to explain? :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas: I understand where you&#8217;re coming from, but I still have to disagree &#8211; mixing products and actions is an odd choice. More to the point is all the scrolling you have to do if you want, say, information about the new Safari beta and have no real pointers on where to look. Or looking for iLife, which is under the &#8220;Mac&#8221; tab now, next to the iMac (what?!). It goes on and on.</p>
<p>Keep in mind that although they do have lots of data about usage patterns, they pretty much changed all the site, so that data is very much bogus right now. It&#8217;s still Apple, I love the design itself, but the navigation itself (the path to what you&#8217;re looking for) feels weird.</p>
<p>Nate: I&#8217;m not sure I understand what you mean. Care to explain? :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/06/apples-oranges/comment-page-1/#comment-41065</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/06/apples-oranges/#comment-41065</guid>
		<description>Too bad you didn&#039;t wait longer to post. I think you&#039;ll be regretting this one in a little while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad you didn&#8217;t wait longer to post. I think you&#8217;ll be regretting this one in a little while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Aylott</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/06/apples-oranges/comment-page-1/#comment-41064</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Aylott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/06/apples-oranges/#comment-41064</guid>
		<description>No offense of anything, but you couldn&#039;t be more wrong.

The section is called &quot;iPod + iTunes&quot; and shockingly enough, that&#039;s what you find when you go to that section.

Having poured through the details of their new site rather thoroughly, it&#039;s blindingly obvious that they put tons of thought and attention to the information architecture.

I&#039;m sure they have massive amounts of data collected over a number of years on what people want to get and how they expect to get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No offense of anything, but you couldn&#8217;t be more wrong.</p>
<p>The section is called &#8220;iPod + iTunes&#8221; and shockingly enough, that&#8217;s what you find when you go to that section.</p>
<p>Having poured through the details of their new site rather thoroughly, it&#8217;s blindingly obvious that they put tons of thought and attention to the information architecture.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure they have massive amounts of data collected over a number of years on what people want to get and how they expect to get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veracon</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/06/apples-oranges/comment-page-1/#comment-41063</link>
		<dc:creator>Veracon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/06/apples-oranges/#comment-41063</guid>
		<description>To be honest, Apple seems to largely be going this way in their user interfaces. If you look at the previews they showed of Mac OS X 10.5 &quot;Leopard&quot;, it&#039;s virtually the same; things like the new &quot;Quick Look&quot; and &quot;Cover Flow&quot;, both of which seem to ignore the type of an object, and just display it instead. I&#039;m not sure I like this approach at all. While it does simplify things, it can also create lots of confusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest, Apple seems to largely be going this way in their user interfaces. If you look at the previews they showed of Mac OS X 10.5 &#8220;Leopard&#8221;, it&#8217;s virtually the same; things like the new &#8220;Quick Look&#8221; and &#8220;Cover Flow&#8221;, both of which seem to ignore the type of an object, and just display it instead. I&#8217;m not sure I like this approach at all. While it does simplify things, it can also create lots of confusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafael</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/06/apples-oranges/comment-page-1/#comment-41062</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/06/apples-oranges/#comment-41062</guid>
		<description>Hey!... yes the new desing is like iTunes new look, It sucks but is minimalistic and that&#039;s what counts these days.... I believe the former menu was better. In this one you have to Imagine how do your stuff...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey!&#8230; yes the new desing is like iTunes new look, It sucks but is minimalistic and that&#8217;s what counts these days&#8230;. I believe the former menu was better. In this one you have to Imagine how do your stuff&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
