<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Better living through existing standards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/08/better-living-through-existing-standards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/08/better-living-through-existing-standards/</link>
	<description>A blog on entrepreneurship, user experience, and web innovation. Published by Fred Oliveira.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:19:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndrÃƒÂ©</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/08/better-living-through-existing-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-41163</link>
		<dc:creator>AndrÃƒÂ©</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 09:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/08/better-living-through-existing-standards/#comment-41163</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s one of the &quot;downsides&quot; of having so much people aware of webstandards. On one hand, you have more websites-done-right and it enables a widespread usage of webapps, on the other hand, you have increased noise in the discussions on what the next steps should be.

I say tomato, you say tomato.

Can you imagine how CSS2.x would have turned out if they kept discussing it  to death? We&#039;d never have a final version of the document. Or would we?

I agree with Zeldman, a glacial pace isn&#039;t all that negative, per se. The web is boiling with webstandards adepts... we can&#039;t rush into any solution just to force everyone to step back a year down the road.

But I&#039;m also with you on that secret wish. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s one of the &#8220;downsides&#8221; of having so much people aware of webstandards. On one hand, you have more websites-done-right and it enables a widespread usage of webapps, on the other hand, you have increased noise in the discussions on what the next steps should be.</p>
<p>I say tomato, you say tomato.</p>
<p>Can you imagine how CSS2.x would have turned out if they kept discussing it  to death? We&#8217;d never have a final version of the document. Or would we?</p>
<p>I agree with Zeldman, a glacial pace isn&#8217;t all that negative, per se. The web is boiling with webstandards adepts&#8230; we can&#8217;t rush into any solution just to force everyone to step back a year down the road.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m also with you on that secret wish. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

