<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on facebook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/09/more-on-facebook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/09/more-on-facebook/</link>
	<description>A blog on entrepreneurship, user experience, and web innovation. Published by Fred Oliveira.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:19:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sin Jin</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/09/more-on-facebook/comment-page-1/#comment-41196</link>
		<dc:creator>Sin Jin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 18:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/09/more-on-facebook/#comment-41196</guid>
		<description>ironic thing is facebook went down hill when it started marketing to all you other blue hairs.  facebook was hip when it was exclusive...when the people on were hormone-enraged 18-22 year olds.  but when you start to throw in a bunch of old farts into the mix the cool factor is bound to go down

in all seriousness...the composition of Facebook&#039;s memberbase will look a lot like Yahoo&#039;s.  There will be pockets of sanity and well mannered interactions but there will also be the kind of NY times square-close your-eyes-and-dont-look type of shenanigans that start to mark any well populated network.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ironic thing is facebook went down hill when it started marketing to all you other blue hairs.  facebook was hip when it was exclusive&#8230;when the people on were hormone-enraged 18-22 year olds.  but when you start to throw in a bunch of old farts into the mix the cool factor is bound to go down</p>
<p>in all seriousness&#8230;the composition of Facebook&#8217;s memberbase will look a lot like Yahoo&#8217;s.  There will be pockets of sanity and well mannered interactions but there will also be the kind of NY times square-close your-eyes-and-dont-look type of shenanigans that start to mark any well populated network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Larkin</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/09/more-on-facebook/comment-page-1/#comment-41190</link>
		<dc:creator>John Larkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 00:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/09/more-on-facebook/#comment-41190</guid>
		<description>Good morning Fred,

I could not agree more. I have been experimenting with Facebook and frankly I find it all a bit irritating. The &quot;games&quot; and comaprative analysis exercises are somewhat pointless and do not appear to improve one&#039;s quality of life. I was particularly annoyed by a trashy sponsored item that appeared in my News Feeds this week. Facebook removed it. It was a multiple choice quiz about picking up female partners! Pathetic!

I just read this item on Twitter Facts. &quot;Messages from private Twitter accounts should be only read by other Twitter accounts that have been approved by the owner of the private Twitter account. I discovered that messages from private Twitter accounts can be read by other users on Facebook.&quot;

http://twitterfacts.blogspot.com/2007/09/private-twitter-accounts-visible-on.html

Facebook is indeed headed down a slippery slope.

Cheers

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good morning Fred,</p>
<p>I could not agree more. I have been experimenting with Facebook and frankly I find it all a bit irritating. The &#8220;games&#8221; and comaprative analysis exercises are somewhat pointless and do not appear to improve one&#8217;s quality of life. I was particularly annoyed by a trashy sponsored item that appeared in my News Feeds this week. Facebook removed it. It was a multiple choice quiz about picking up female partners! Pathetic!</p>
<p>I just read this item on Twitter Facts. &#8220;Messages from private Twitter accounts should be only read by other Twitter accounts that have been approved by the owner of the private Twitter account. I discovered that messages from private Twitter accounts can be read by other users on Facebook.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://twitterfacts.blogspot.com/2007/09/private-twitter-accounts-visible-on.html" rel="nofollow">http://twitterfacts.blogspot.com/2007/09/private-twitter-accounts-visible-on.html</a></p>
<p>Facebook is indeed headed down a slippery slope.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

