<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Evaluating product ideas, defining success</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/12/evaluating-ideas-and-definining-success/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/12/evaluating-ideas-and-definining-success/</link>
	<description>A blog on entrepreneurship, user experience, and web innovation. Published by Fred Oliveira.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:56:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Webreakstuff &#187; Facebook, Scoble and data portability</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/12/evaluating-ideas-and-definining-success/comment-page-1/#comment-41322</link>
		<dc:creator>Webreakstuff &#187; Facebook, Scoble and data portability</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 19:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/12/evaluating-ideas-and-definining-success/#comment-41322</guid>
		<description>[...] Furrier says 2008 will be the year of trust, and I&#8217;ve written about it a couple of weeks ago too. A lot of these problems need to be solved, and hopefully we&#8217;ll continue moving towards [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Furrier says 2008 will be the year of trust, and I&#8217;ve written about it a couple of weeks ago too. A lot of these problems need to be solved, and hopefully we&#8217;ll continue moving towards [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How it&#8217;s done! â€œEvaluating new product ideasâ€ &#171; de-Hao! [ How it&#8217;s done! ]</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/12/evaluating-ideas-and-definining-success/comment-page-1/#comment-41311</link>
		<dc:creator>How it&#8217;s done! â€œEvaluating new product ideasâ€ &#171; de-Hao! [ How it&#8217;s done! ]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 00:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/12/evaluating-ideas-and-definining-success/#comment-41311</guid>
		<description>[...] wonâ€™t count out Fred Oliveiraâ€™s addition to the list: â€¢Â Â Â  Trustworthiness: Can people trust your solution/application? I will also like to weigh [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wonâ€™t count out Fred Oliveiraâ€™s addition to the list: â€¢Â Â Â  Trustworthiness: Can people trust your solution/application? I will also like to weigh [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Griffin</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/12/evaluating-ideas-and-definining-success/comment-page-1/#comment-41307</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Griffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 13:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2007/12/evaluating-ideas-and-definining-success/#comment-41307</guid>
		<description>I agree that trustworthiness should be added to the list. I my experience, some of the greatest ideas can be undermined by a &quot;fly-by-night&quot; appearance. When it comes to product idea, many times, all people have is their instincts. It&#039;s important to both be trustworthy and appear trustworthy in order to avoid violating those instincts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that trustworthiness should be added to the list. I my experience, some of the greatest ideas can be undermined by a &#8220;fly-by-night&#8221; appearance. When it comes to product idea, many times, all people have is their instincts. It&#8217;s important to both be trustworthy and appear trustworthy in order to avoid violating those instincts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
