<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Techcrunch&#8217;s Tablet project</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2008/07/a-better-connected-device/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2008/07/a-better-connected-device/</link>
	<description>A blog on entrepreneurship, user experience, and web innovation. Published by Fred Oliveira.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:19:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2008/07/a-better-connected-device/comment-page-1/#comment-41671</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/?p=366#comment-41671</guid>
		<description>Bluetooth capabilities would rock, especially with v3.0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bluetooth capabilities would rock, especially with v3.0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2008/07/a-better-connected-device/comment-page-1/#comment-41563</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 05:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/?p=366#comment-41563</guid>
		<description>I know that the iPod touch isn&#039;t technically an &quot;open&quot; platform, but if they made one with a 7 inch screen, I bet people would buy it as a simple internet tablet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that the iPod touch isn&#8217;t technically an &#8220;open&#8221; platform, but if they made one with a 7 inch screen, I bet people would buy it as a simple internet tablet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruslan</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2008/07/a-better-connected-device/comment-page-1/#comment-41536</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruslan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 11:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/?p=366#comment-41536</guid>
		<description>Hmm, interesting... if this tablet sees the world...  if we speak about how it looks its great.. but if we speak about anything else.. we have to touch it, to understand :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, interesting&#8230; if this tablet sees the world&#8230;  if we speak about how it looks its great.. but if we speak about anything else.. we have to touch it, to understand :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dong</title>
		<link>http://blog.webreakstuff.com/2008/07/a-better-connected-device/comment-page-1/#comment-41518</link>
		<dc:creator>Dong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webreakstuff.com/?p=366#comment-41518</guid>
		<description>&quot;No need for GSM, itÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s just not a phone. ItÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s a platform.&quot;

Makes sense, but I hope it isn&#039;t limited to wi-fi and it includes support for usb broadband modems, wouldn&#039;t be pricier because of that.

&quot;We will probably take the Gnome Onscreen Keyboard&quot; eek.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;No need for GSM, itÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s just not a phone. ItÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s a platform.&#8221;</p>
<p>Makes sense, but I hope it isn&#8217;t limited to wi-fi and it includes support for usb broadband modems, wouldn&#8217;t be pricier because of that.</p>
<p>&#8220;We will probably take the Gnome Onscreen Keyboard&#8221; eek.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

